# Non-Linear Curve Fitting is Nature Publication Worthy?

[This article was first published on

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Someone needs to explain to me why this is a Nature publication …**Odd Hypothesis**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Granted it is Nature

**Protocols**which started its publication run when I was in grad school and is likely less high-impact as full blown Nature. Seriously tough – using the Solver Add-in in Excel to do non-linear curve fitting gets published? If a younger version of myself knew about this, I’d have a Nature publication as a junior in undergrad.

It should be noted that such Nature worthy protocols are accomplished in the following 6 lines of R code (in this case for fitting a Michaelis-Menton curve):

f = formula(v ~ vmax*s/(km + s)) data = data.frame( s = c(1250, 625, 313, 156, 78, 39, 20, 10), v = c(148.68, 123.66, 96.84, 69.76, 45.54, 27.84, 16.38, 9.24) ) fit = nls(f, data=data, start=list(vmax=1, km=1), algorithm='port', trace=F, lower=0) summary(fit)

(note: I’m including the blank line in my 6-line count) On a similar thread, does that mean I can get a publication for this?

To

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:**Odd Hypothesis**.R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.